Packer Hog Ban Lifted; Proposal To Combat Sex Assaults On Campus Heard
February 8th, 2016
Meat-packers with plants in Nebraska will be able to own hogs in the state, under a bill passed by the Legislature Friday. And a proposal to spend half a million dollars to try and prevent sexual assaults on college campuses received a public hearing.
Nebraska is the only state in the nation to prohibit meatpacking companies from owning the hogs they slaughter. Supporters of the ban say it prevents the further vertical integration of the industry, ensuring free markets where independent hog producers can get better prices. Opponents say it prevents farmers from contracting to raise hogs for meat-packers like Smithfield Foods, which has a plant in Crete, Nebraska and supports overturning the ban.
Among those arguing for keeping the ban was Sen. David Schnoor of Scribner, himself a farmer and cattle feeder. Schnoor argued removing this barrier to vertical integration in the hog industry would create pressure for the same thing in the cattle industry. â€œI know the livestock industry. I need you to listen and listen carefully. I cannot sound the alarm any more loudly,â€ Schnoor said.
Sen. Ken Schilz of Ogallala, sponsor of the repeal proposal, attacked the current law. Â â€œIf you run a business, if you manage a business, if you own a business, do you want the state because thatâ€™s what we do with the law that is currently in place. Any other business in the state of Nebraska can contract with whomever they want,â€ Schilz said. â€œQuit worrying about trying to legislate nostalgia and letâ€™s understand what 21stÂ century agricultural (practice) is, and how we can adapt and be successful in the new world.â€
Sen. John Murante of Gretna sided with Schilz, arguing that removing the ban is consistent with free market principles. â€œAt the end of the day, weâ€™re going to end up with better outcomes more often if we deregulate and get government out of the way,â€ Murante said. â€œI see this as a way â€“ a small way â€“ in which we are taking government regulation out of the lives and out of industry in the state of Nebraska.â€
But Sen. Lydia Brasch of Bancroft objected to removing the ban, criticizing Smithfieldâ€™s ownership by a company linked to the government of China. â€œThis is a game changer. Â And this is not a game. This is very serious,â€ Brasch said.
With opponents filibustering to prevent a vote on the bill, Schilz moved for cloture, to cut off debate. That requires a 2/3 majority â€“ 33 of the 49 senators. Schilz got 34 votes, and senators then voted 34-14 to give the bill overturning the ban final approval. Gov. Pete Ricketts is expected to sign it into law.
Friday afternoon, members of the Judiciary Committee heard testimony in support of a proposal by Lincoln Sen. Adam Morfeld to spend half a million dollars on grants for colleges in Nebraska to try and prevent sexual assaults. Morfeld said sexual assault is a big problem at colleges in Nebraska and around the nation, where one study found that one in five women are is assaulted during their her time in college.
Brendan Gallo, a junior at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, said the money could be used to expand activities like presentations in fraternities and dorms, and social media campaigns that convey messages like â€œgroping isnâ€™t just rude, itâ€™s illegal.â€
Gallo said itâ€™s also important to train students how to react to sexual assault. He gave an example of how the training heâ€™s received helped him know what to say when a male friend told him his girlfriend had been raped. â€œThe first thing thing that you want to just keep reemphasizing is to tell them that it wasnâ€™t their fault, he said. That sounds obvious, he said, but sometimes the situation can make it difficult.
Gallo said sometimes, the person who was sexually assaulted may have been making advances to the other person before the assault. It can be â€œincredibly difficultâ€ to hear that someone youâ€™re in a relationship was dancing with or kissing another person, â€œbut in the end, you still need to be there for them,â€ Gallo said.
No one testified in opposition to the bill.
Comments are closed.