Death penalty to stay on books at least one more year
May 15th, 2013
Lincoln, NE – The failure of the death penalty repeal had been forecast by a test vote Monday, and little changed as senators debated the bill Tuesday. Death penalty opponents like Sen. Sue Crawford of Bellevue argued that because it is used so infrequently, the death penalty does not work:
“If you think executions are important for justice, you have to face the fact that they are not happening,” said Crawford. “Having the death penalty on the books is not leading to the deaths of those accused of heinous crimes, and it is not giving the families closure,” said Crawford.
Sen. John Nelson of Omaha said the lack of executions in recent years was not justification to change the law.
“Just because we haven’t been able to carry those out is no reason to do away with the death penalty. Sooner or later, regardless of what you hear on the floor, it will be done,” said Nelson
Omaha Sen. Scott Lautenbaugh defended the process used to arrive at death sentences:
“No one is rushed through this process,” said Lautenbaugh. “No one’s conviction goes un-revisited, unexamined. This process is fair. This process is just. It is not arbitrary. The facts of each case differ. This is a just penalty. It should be maintained. And I think it is our job as a society to actually met out this most serious penalty,” Lautenbaugh said.
Omaha Sen. Steve Lathrop said it’s just a matter of time before the death penalty is abolished:
“As the Supreme Court reviews the death penalty, and whether it is or is not cruel and unusual punishment, that is an incremental process,” said Lathrop. “It will not happen overnight. But it will happen gradually. It will happen as more states repeal it, for whatever reason. And the standards of decency in this country will ultimately result, as I said yesterday, in the Supreme Court concluding that this is cruel and unusual punishment,” said Lathrop.
With repeal opponents vowing to talk the bill to death, supporters tried to invoke cloture, which would cut off debate and produce a yes-or-no vote on repeal. It received 26 votes, including those of Sen. Jerry Johnson of Wahoo, a death penalty supporter, and Sen. Paul Schumacher of Columbus, who had not declared his position.
Both said they thought the Legislature should vote on the issue, regardless of their position. But while the 26 votes represented a majority of the 49-member Unicameral, legislative rules require a 2/3 vote, or 33 senators, to invoke cloture.
On another matter, senators took up Gov. Dave Heineman’s veto of changes to the teacher retirement system. The bill would reduce future retirement benefits of new hires, and increase the state contribution by $20 million a year. In his veto message, Heineman complained that teachers were not being asked to contribute more.
Sen. Jeremy Nordquist of Omaha, the bill’s sponsor, argued their contribution had gone up from 7.28 to 9.78 percent of salary two years ago, when the state had no additional money to contribute. Senators voted 32-1 in favor of his proposal to override the governor’s veto.
Comments are closed.
- Nebraska Legislative District 9 Candidate: Larry Roland
- Ballot questions in three states may affect death penalty nationwide
- History shows Nebraska ballot campaigns have big passion, low success
- Omaha City Councilwoman Aimee Melton talks annexation, death penalty with KVNO
- Nebraska Supreme Court to rule on publication of serial killer’s artwork