Watered down pipeline bill eases ahead
May 19th, 2011
Lincoln, NE – A watered-down pipeline bill has eased ahead in the Nebraska Unicameral.
After months of public controversy and legislative inaction, not a single senator voted against Cedar Rapids Sen. Kate Sullivanâ€™s pipeline bill. It was introduced after TransCanada announced plans for a pipeline carrying tar sands from Alberta to Texas through the Sandhills and over the Ogalalla Aquifer. Sullivanâ€™s original bill would have held pipeline companies strictly liable for damages if oil leaks. After the Natural Resources Committee refused to advance the bill, Sullivan agreed to scale back her proposal. Now, it would require pipeline companies to restore the land, and makes no mention of economic damages. It also doesnâ€™t say anything about what happens to the pipeline after itâ€™s no longer used. Omaha Sen. Steve Lathrop asked Sullivan about that.
â€œRight now weâ€™re at the beginning of the process, and they havenâ€™t put the pipe in the ground,â€ he said. â€œIsnâ€™t that the time to set up what we should do at the end of the useful life of the pipe, rather than legislate it in the middle of the life of the pipe?â€
â€œIn a perfect world, yes,â€ Sullivan responded. â€œAnd as I said, I did what I could in terms of getting something out here on the floor.â€
Lincoln Senator Tony Fulton said he has friends whoâ€™ve been threatened with eminent domain if they didnâ€™t let TransCanada build the pipeline through their land. Fulton said even though the U.S. State Department decides whether to grant TransCanada a permit, the Legislature has a role.
â€œWe speak on behalf of Nebraska,â€ he said. â€œAnd we have some skin in this game.â€
â€œWeâ€™re a sovereign state and we should not be pushed around by the Secretary of State, or a company from another country, or any company for that matter,â€ Fulton added.
Sen. Tyson Larson of Oâ€™Neill said a pipeline already built by TransCanada east of the Sandhills has brought benefits. â€œIn my district there has been positive feedback from the first pipeline construction,â€ Larson said. â€œConstituents in Cedar County have talked about the increased economic activity and the responsible practices of TransCanada.â€
Lincoln Senator Bill Avery asked what he said was a rhetorical question. â€œIs this the best we can do?â€ he asked. â€œOr is it the most weâ€™re willing to do?â€
Avery and others faulted the bill for not dealing with liability and siting. Other senators said itâ€™s a start. Senator LeRoy Louden of Ellsworth used an historical analogy. â€œI guess the first thing I think of is a quote from Winston Churchill after the British won the battle of el Alemain,â€ Louden said. â€œHe said this isnâ€™t the end, and it isnâ€™t the beginning, but it is the end of the beginning.â€
Senators then voted 47-0 to first-round approval of the bill.
Comments are closed.